<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mindtangle - Latest Comments in The History of Instructables</title><link>http://mindtangle.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mindtangle.disqus.com/the_history_of_instructables/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:13:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The History of Instructables</title><link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/08/11/the-history-of-instructables/#comment-3776276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, he wasn't exactly buttering up the investors with that one...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">enguyen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The History of Instructables</title><link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/08/11/the-history-of-instructables/#comment-3776277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That quote doesn't strike me as particularly great for investor relations / confidence.  I mean, it's well and good to be proud of what you achieve; hopefully those people with a sunk cost in owning the enterprise feel the same way about their asset.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benchun</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>