<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mindtangle - Latest Comments in Productivity and Wealth</title><link>http://mindtangle.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mindtangle.disqus.com/productivity_and_wealth/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:03:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Productivity and Wealth</title><link>http://mindtangle.net/2005/10/26/productivity-and-wealth/#comment-3775732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adjunct to your discussion is the assumption that there is some way of verifying that 'superproducers' do in fact exist, or have impacts that are in some way quantifiably 'productive.'  Nassim Taleb believes that the relationship between pay and the ability to measure performance &lt;a href="http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/postscriptfbr.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/postscriptfbr.pdf"&gt;is in fact inverse&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gknot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:03:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>